Monday, March 30, 2015
Not so special after all.
I've been to visit a few times over the past couple of decades. Previously they took me to the Apache Prisoner's Of War cemetery where Geronimo is buried. I saw his burial marker and those related or connected to him by tribe. Families are buried next to relatives and who a person was and who they were connected to is etched into the tombstone. For example: Thomas Dah-Ke-Ya was an Apache, son of Dah-Ke-Ya and Lulu Geronimo, 1890, 1908.
Here's another example with Zi-Yeh, wife of Geronimo.
They have a connection to others. In return, they are connected.
But I also saw several lone headstones. They stood isolated, far from the neat rows of family markers where father and mother lay next to children and their spouses. Singular headstones. The one that got my attention on my first visit was Francisco's. An Apache Woman, 1847, 1901.
My immediate thought was, who is the woman? Why is she here, isolated from the other Apache and their families? Was she an outcast? Was she unknown?
I glommed onto that last idea: was she unknown. That's because I am fixated on the fact that one day I will no longer exist. People try to tell me that I'll live on in my daughter's genes, in my writing, the memories of my friends and family. That's small comfort but it does seep into my writing.
I have thought about the idea of a character's permanence being dependent on being remembered. The more they are remembered, the more substantial their "ghost" is. And as the memories fade, so do they. But if they are remembered again, they once again gain substance. An interesting premise but one that I find some comfort in. In that even though I'll be nothing, I won't be forgotten. For a while, anyway.
So, great, I'm thinking of Francisco the Apache woman and my thinking of her gives her substance. I'm the bearer of a small torch for an unknown woman.
Then I get the glorious idea to Google her. Ah, vanity, they name is Earl. There's a decent amount of information about her at Wikitree.
She doesn't need me, she's been enshrined on the world wide web. Which is a healthy reminder that none of us (I'm looking at you, mirror) are really so special after all.
There was another singular tombstone for an Apache named John Smith. I've just included him to add a little substantiation to him as well.
Saturday, March 7, 2015
Are we breaking rules or just changing out parts?
Last night at FogCon 5 I at through a conversation about breaking rules in story telling. The blurb in the conference guide suggested that the talk would be about characters not following their stereotypes. That seemed like a good idea. And there were several attempts to touch on the subject. Heck, maybe there were more but I just tuned out after hearing the word "hetero-normative" one too many times.
Yes, I'm a white, middle aged, heterosexual male, but that doesn't mean I don't care about people who don't fit in the same pigeon hole with me. Because I do. But when the discussion stays fixated on the idea that writing about transgender people or "non-tragic lesbians" in the same roles as a heterosexual male would have been in, are you really breaking rules? Personally, I don't think you are. You might be leveling the playing field, but you aren't breaking new ground. Especially if all you're doing is preaching to the choir.
A good attempt at explaining the breaking of the storytelling rule was the idea of "Flowers For Algernon." However, the story has been told before in H. G. Wells's "The Invisible Man." Both are the same story of humanities distrust and fear off those who are different. What is different is the kind of character in the same situation: you're not like us, we can't determine your motivations so you are a that to use, we will isolate you. No rules broken here, please move along. And there are probably older and newer stories that are the same, just different characters.
So whether the character is Anglo Saxon hetero, or green scaled poly sexual, doesn't matter if they are the captain of the research vessel Beagle, they're still just the captain. Nothing's changed in the story, only a part has been replaced for another part. Same rules, just different characters.
I admire those who write non-traditional characters into their stories. I think it's important that we see that the role can be played by anyone and the job still gets done. I think that's called "normalizing," making things that seem untraditional traditional. Whatever you call, it the point remains the same, the song remains the same, the story hasn't changed, only the parts have been replaced.
Rules haven't been broken.
All of which doesn't mean the conversation wasn't interest or thought provoking, it probably just needed a more relevant title. Like: If Kirk had been gay, would the universe have turned out differently? That'd be an interesting conversation.
Thursday, January 29, 2015
Goals. Sheesh, goals.
I'm not done with the play. I've been sidetracked several times. I allowed them to slow me down. The question is probably why did I let them slow me down? I know - I'm pretty sure I know - that the main reason is that I'm unsure of some parts of the play and that the length of the first act is coming in short. I shouldn't let that bother me. I know that whatever I write will need some rewriting, if not completely rewritten. That's no longer a bad thing for me. Once it's down, I have a better idea where I really want to go, the themes of the play will have asserted themselves somewhere and now need to be incorporated through the whole play. Despite all that I am still allowing my doubts to freeze my forward motion.
Also, there is the stops and starts. I stopped to work on two short plays. I stopped to work on some book stuff for a friend's book. Then I started working on the play again. But the energy had been sapped, the way had become less clear. I've had to read everything written so far to find the thread and then continue hesitantly like Hansel and Gretel trying to find the crumbs to lead them back home.
However, I am not going to stop at the end of the month, the goal was to complete a full-length play. So even though it'll carry over into February, and I have things to be doing in February, it'll now include finishing this play.
Monday, January 19, 2015
Treading water in a current.
So, I may have not gotten anywhere, but I was creating new material.
No dialogue to share, no picture to post. How about a joke?
Q: What did one snowman say to the other?
A: Do you smell carrots?
:D
Wednesday, January 14, 2015
Whittling a peg to fit a different shaped hole.
Or, how I don't like writing plays to satisfy someone else's expectations.
I'm not working on Ms Tittle's today or tomorrow. Tomorrow I have to rewrite a ten-minute play because I am finally - finally! - getting a chance to attend a scene night with PCSF. It's been months, I think, since I've had the opportunity. But that's not what I'm grousing about.The play I've been working on today, and will finish tomorrow - cause it's due tomorrow - is a play that I volunteered to write and it has to fit specific criteria. It's a play about a Cheyenne woman from the 1870s who fights along the male warriors to defeat General Crook and save her brother from certain death. That's my choice, it just had to be about a woman, for the 365 Women A Year Project.
There are much worse restrictions for play opportunities. "You must mention the word, Albatross." or "There must be a teapot in the play." or "This opportunity is only open to six foot tall New Englanders with one or more body piercings and owns a shrubbery." The last one is, I hope you see, an exaggeration, and also off topic because it's another annoying restriction. No, the real issue that makes me gnash my teeth is "theme-ing" the play contest/festival. I don't know about other playwrights, but I'm not inclined to stop what I'm doing to write a new play, to fit some specifics that someone else generated, that may not be chosen for the production and just might, in many cases, be completely unsuitable for any other opportunity, thus rendering the play useless.
I also feel that really good playwrights and really good plays aren't looked at, and - I may be wrong on this - the quality of the submitted plays may be collectively less than if there'd been no restrictions on what subject the play can be about.
And, of course, it's not always a terrible inconvenience to my arrogant playwright Id. Asking for plays that focus on a general theme of death, or LGBT issues, or - as I mentioned being involved in above - women's history. Working on this play for 365 Women hasn't been a burden, nor a real issue - except that I wish there'd been more history to pull upon for Buffalo Calf Road and more depth of Cheyenne folk tales and mythology. What it did to was remind me of all these other opportunities where they are so specific I wonder if the person in charge is a failed playwright purposefully torturing other playwrights as a balm to their own pain.
Really, the only reason I'd ever want to write a play that centered around a garden trowel is if I came up with the idea on my own to help tell a story I already wanted to tell.
But I'm grousing. :)
Tuesday, January 13, 2015
Rough cuts can be sanded and shaped.
All but one of my other first draft plays have 3 or 4 actor requirements. Ninguna Verdad has five. Ms Tittle's House for Retired Circus and Sideshow Folk has nine. There are so many balls in the air as I write. Have I gotten Ameerah the stage time she needs? Who'd I forget in the last twenty pages? How's the story line between Howard and Maybelle developing? Have I lost that thread? Then, I've also written from the front of Act I, the back of Act II, and now the front of Act II.
I can see the rough areas. I have an idea of what needs to be fine tuned or trimmed away. But right now I need to get the whole thing done, even if it's ragged around some of the more complicated curves.
So far there are 37 pages of Act I written, and 21 pages of Act II. I'm not yet half way to the end of the month and I'm a few pages over halfway to the end of the first draft.
In other news, I read over Dr. Edgar's Brains last night and this morning. This is the play that will get a developmental table ready in February. As it stands, it needs a little light sanding to remove the spelling errors and word choice errors. There's some reworking that I know will come up. It's not the first draft by far, but it's also rarely been shared. It's going to be quite a learning experience to sit there and listen and then discuss a whole full-length play with just actors and a dramaturg. Their points of view will be different from a room full of playwrights who "wouldn't have written it that way."
Here's some of today's work on Ms Tittle's:
How'd you know that?
Monday, January 12, 2015
Didn't see that coming.
I shifted to be beginning of Act II today and have begun to approach the lottery scene from that direction. I feel a bit like I'm laying tile and when I'm done writing the scenes I'll have to go back and add the grout, the little bit that connects the tiles to each other. Well, not really, but the idea kind of works.
Also got a surprise email today. RonWeaver, over at PlayCafe, has been working on a play development program where playwrights can get their play of any length read by actors and then get feedback from the actors, a director, and a dramaturg. I'd put my name in the hat, thinking that one day I might get picked.
Today's email was to let me know that I'll be the inaugural play/playwright for the new venture. Exciting and disconcerting at the same time. I know I'm not sitting before judges, but I still always feel like I'm being judged.
It's going to be a great opportunity and I'll have to keep myself - the only person who reads this - updated on how the process goes.
In the mean time, here's my cats:
Sunday, January 11, 2015
Sometimes you just have to play hard to get.
Several pages were written in my notebook from the other day, but I hadn't counted them before, so it's fair. I hope.
The eleven pages I wrote today come at the end of Act II. This is not a normal procedure for me. When I get stuck on a piece I will often mull over it for days. As the goal is to finish the play before the end of the month, I knew I couldn't afford to use my time just thinking. I needed to be active as well. Active in the sense that I'm putting words on paper, not just thinking about the.
With that in mind, I started working on the ending of the play. I knew, roughly, how it was supposed to go. Yesterday I did a quick outline and today I did a more detailed outline. Then I changed the ending from a Pollyanna kind of ending - where they win the lottery - to one more painful - where they don't win the lottery - and must decide to work together, make sacrifices, and pull through as a family. So no deus ex machina saving the play at the end. I wrote the scene after that, where James calls Jim on the phone to solicit and receive help first. That's sort of the end of the play. Then I wrote the lottery scene. I'm working my way backwards.
Here's the point: while I was working on all that, I solved some of the problems keeping me from working on the first act. I had consciously ignored it, it got jealous, and hit on my through my sub-conscious. Now I have more details for the play and it seems to be rolling along even better.
That doesn't mean I'm going to have a stage ready play by the end of the month, but it does mean I'll have a play. Hopefully a play worth working on. Time will tell.
Here's the lottery:
Saturday, January 10, 2015
Closed for repairs.
I ran errands with my wife and daughter today. Spent some time sitting in the car, waiting. Fortunately I've started to carry a notebook again. (If you write, you should probably consider always having a notebook in easy reach.) I had some thoughts about the first act and some rearranging of events in the last third of the act. And, since I'd written down dialogue for the end of the play, I also made more notes about the second act. That lead to me writing a brief outline of that act.
Now I have a skeleton of an outline for act II. What that means is that I am more comfortable with how that act will go. I wasn't as sure on the details for Act II when I started writing the play, this has cleared out some of the fog of confusion. I'll be putting that new information into a slide presentation so I can fill each scene out, adding all the detail I feel like I'll need to write the act.
As I said. I've nothing to show for the day, as far as lines of dialogue, but I've accomplished so much more.
Here's a rainbow from Maui, Hawaii, so you don't feel like you've wasted your time here. :)
Friday, January 9, 2015
Back it up, try, try again.
That's pretty much what I did.
This morning, as my daughter was sleeping in longer than her normal 7 am, I found I had a little extra time to write. I wrote 3 and 1/2 pages of notes. I wrote thoughts and ideas about what I had and where it was going, what I was missing, and some dialogue that occurred to me.
Now, this evening, as I wrap up for the evening, I have rewritten around four pages of new lines. The current page count is 37. Which means I wrote about four pages this evening. Tomorrow I'd like to get four more pages and have forty by the tenth day. That's still a good number to have at this point. It means I can still finish the whole play by the end of the month and actually have a good draft.
Tonight, instead of sharing dialogue I thought I'd show what my notes look like. If they seem cryptic, that's just my handwriting.
Here it is:
More tomorrow. I hope.
Thursday, January 8, 2015
This is not the post you are looking for.
Here's what I'm going to do. I'm going to read through what I have. There are parts I know are missing and I'll weave those in as go along. When I get close to the end, where I believe I went astray, I'll copy everything up to that point into a new document. Then I'll start typing again, making sure I choose the right words to bend the play in the right direction.
Here's what I have for the last pages (32-34) right now:
And, shush, you scoundrel. Don't breath a word of this.
Wednesday, January 7, 2015
The Creation of Play is a Lot Like a Relationship
While I was there I was thinking about my play that I'm writing. The one I've been commenting on since the first day of the year. It occurred to me that right now, the actual writing of the play is a lot like being married. To make it work, you have put effort into it. You have to give a 100%.
From their I worked my way backward to the honeymoon. That's where you first sit down to write the play, full of the passion of the idea, fresh off the outline - if you're smart and did one - and the first pages flow like the sweetest nectar.
What's before that? Well, there's the writing of the outline, getting to know the play, finding out what works, what doesn't work. Trying to understand what make it tick. We're in the dating phase of the relationship. There's some restraint in the beginning until everyone is comfortable with everyone. If you tell people about your play idea, you've taken the date home to have dinner with your folks.
Now, before the dating, the courtship and all that, there's the flirting stage. Casual eye contact, a word exchanged here or there, trying to feel out if the other is a good fit. That initial blossom of, 'is there a future here.'
For me, that's what a play cycle is like. The flirting takes a short time or a long time, depending on the depth of the play. If you're trying to get laid at the party, you're not looking for something deep. That's short plays for you. Courtship, the outlining, can be quick, depending on how soon the play and I start clicking, where everything feels right, like it was always meant to be. I like the honeymoon part, just sitting down and the dialogue just pours out. I can spend ours here, sometimes even a few days. But then we get down to life. And life, when writing a full-length play, is not all champagne and caviar. Much of it is laborious, taking things back, putting things aside, pacing yourself, thinking before speaking. And it is, energy wise, the longest part of the relationship.
Sometimes you just have to put the play aside, things aren't working. A divorce is needed.
Fortunately that is not the case with this play. I'm just in that marriage stage, just after the honeymoon is over where I'm going through the phase of 'what have I done to myself! Why did I commit to this relationship! Look at that hot little short play I could be doing."
Yeah, that's how my brain works.
For now, though, I spent some time during my daughter's nap scrubbing the shower and working on the play. I've gone ahead and gone back to find out where Sterk can make his appearances. First to introduce him and show his weakness, second to show that he has a ring for Tina. At that point in the play, no one - except Tina and Ameerah - know about the notice of foreclosure. So James think Sterk asking Tina to marry might make her happy. After the news, though, it seems like maybe he ought to put that off. Not sure if that'll be a simple issue or a complex one. Haven't gotten there.
The result is that I've added one page to the play and I'm on 34. Considering this is the seventh, I'm averaging just under 5 pages a day. I'll probably fall behind again as I have to rewrite a 10-minute play for a meeting tomorrow night. But we'll see. Daughter was up late and if I get up early and come to the computer, maybe I'll get some pages down after all.
Here's a smidgen from today:
Tuesday, January 6, 2015
Energy ebbs, unhelped by a bad night sleep and a "play date" for the daughter.
I'm sitting here in front of the computer and nothing is getting done. I woke up somewhere around a dozen times last night. Then, this morning, we had a play date. So there were six of them running loose. (Not to disparage the event, they had fun and I had good adult conversation/company.)
But that's not the only reason nearly nothing is getting written today. Primarily, it's concern about the story, the arcs, the plot points, and some of the dialogue. Overall, despite looking like it's going to come in way short of 50 pages, it has a good feel. The end feels a bit wooden and there are still pieces missing. But it's nothing to be ashamed of.
While my daughter napped I managed to get back to the beginning and get Feur and Barba's relationship clarified. (I'd also finally figured out how to work their relationship: Feur had made, previously, an agreement to marry Barba when it got is sense of taste back. Something he never believed would happen.) That story line will need some cleaning up, but I've laid the foundation.
I also have the first appearance of Sterk Mens in place. We get to see him and learn that he can't even open a jar of apple sauce. Later it makes sense when people are introduced and his backstory is highlighted. I plan on having him get help from James when he can't get the engagement ring box open. That part will happen in the first act but won't be fully realized until about 2/3 of the way through the second act. (This is all how I see it in my head. Subject to change.)
We're here on day six of the month long challenge. I'm at 32 pages. So, still better than the 3/day minimum.
The hard part right now is trying to keep moving forward to the end of the act without getting too caught up in the tinkering that is so difficult to resist.
Here's the beginning again with the Feur/Barba relationship introduced and Sterk Mens' first appearance:
-----
Monday, January 5, 2015
Pace slows as I check for sink-holes.
But, San Jose Sharks had a 5pm start which meant I had more time on the computer after they won and now I have 31 pages of the script done.
I also wrote some notes in my physical notebook. I know I'm not getting everything down as I write this first draft. And somethings occur to me as I reflect on what I have down so far. Believe it or not, but I'm actually moving tentatively through the play right now. I'm listening to the voices I've given each character, seeing how it feels to me, looking for things that I need to have set up earlier in the act or will need to set up now for the second act.
I sometimes realize that I've forgotten something. In this case, it's something big. Howard was supposed to pull his hand out of his coat pocket to open the kitchen door for Maybelle, only to spill a pocket full of small pieces of paper onto the floor. Then he suddenly realizes that he forgot to put the new paper in the other pocket and he no longer knows which one was the new piece. It's kind of an important plot point that sets up for deep into act II. And I just realized I'd forgotten to write it in as I was writing this blog post.
There's a few others but I'll get them on the second draft. All of that will effect the length of the first act. I'm just worried that it's not enough to push the page count to 50+ without looking like fluff and filler.
Here's some from today:
Sunday, January 4, 2015
Potholes in the road.
As I am writing, trying to keep to the outline as logically as I can, I see that the story has gotten along pretty far and there's only a couple more scenes and the act is over. But the first act should be closer to 50 pages. For this play it might be better at 60 because of the overlapping dialogue.
While this might be a good time to panic, throw in the towel and become a beet farmer, I'm aware of something else. There are potholes in the story. There are things missing that I know I want to add and that will effect the story and the number of pages. I also know that when I read through it I'll see things that I didn't do or should have done.
So despite the fact I feel like I'm falling short of the goal, I am aware that on a second go-around things will change for the better.
I mean, Sterk Mens' romantic interest in Tina Tittle hasn't been mentioned one bit, and barely have I touched on his own issue. Feur's supposed to get his sense of taste back, Barba hasn't shown her lust for food (and Feur) in this first draft
Things will get rearranged and altered/fixed. About the third pass, if I'm not getting the page numbers, well then I'll buy my Burpee Beet seeds.
And this is something else to be careful of: I can't just put stuff in to fluff up the page count. This isn't chicken breast that you can fill with water to get more per pound. The dialogue has to be relevant, it has to move the play along and be interesting. "Interesting," always my greatest fear; the lack of it.
Something from today:
Okay.... what's going on?